Author: Sanjay Goel, http://in.linkedin.com/in/sgoel
________________________________________
Minister Jairam Ramesh’s recent comment on IITs and IIMs not having world-class faculty has led to an intense debate. Many academicians are giving an emotional response. Politicians are known for doing this anyway. Here is what I feel about the issue.
Not being ‘world class’ does not mean that these institutes are not good or are not good for the industry/country. A spade is a spade. Facts must be accepted before jumping at conclusion. As per various international rankings, our top institute are not among the top institutes as per any list. How many Nobel laureates work at our top institutes? How many BTech’s from IIT aspire to join ‘world class’ IITs for Master’s or PhD? How many IIM graduates aspire to join ‘world class’ IIMs for PhD? How much of world changing research has been carried out at our top institutes? How many patents are in the name of our top institutes? How many world class companies have been incubated by our top institutes? How many world class conferences have been initiated and are regularly organized by our top institutes? How many world class journals are published by our top institutes? Does our curriculum offer world class flexibility? How many new innovative interdisciplinary educational programs have been launched by our top institutes in the last five years? How many international students or faculty are there at our top institutes?
Every year, IITs are able to very easily get a very large chunk of major government research grants from various government agencies. How many these projects have succeeded in delivering the real objectives? Interestingly, IIT professors find it very convenient to sit in most of the assessment and evaluation processes of other institutes. But None of IITs go through the accreditation process by NAAC or NBA or other agencies. On the other hand, a good number of programs at world’s top universities, e.g., MIT, UC Berkeley, Stanford etc. are accredited by agnecies like ABET etc. Do IIT faculty welcome any initiative for the quality assessment of their own government funded institutions?
Let us compare the research output of IITs with the premier international universities like MIT, Stanford, UC Berkeley, CMU, etc. ACM guide to computing literture on ACM digital library provides bibliographic records of research papers published at various forum including ACM and affiliated organisations, IEEE, etc. In May, 2011, the following data was captured from this respository:
Count of papers: 1.7 Million (approx.)
Count of papers with author(s) from MIT, USA: approx. 10,000
Count of papers with author(s) from Stanford University, USA: approx. 9,000
Count of papers with author(s) from CMU, USA: apprx. 11,000
Count of papers with author(s) from UC Berkeley, USA: apprx. 7,400
Count of papers with author(s) from Cornell University, USA: apprx. 4,200
Count of papers with author(s) from India: less than 12,000
Count of papers with author(s) from all IITs: approx. 3,700
This data shows that following two common beliefs are not correct:
1. Only IITs do quality research in India: As per this repository of computing literature, more than 2/3rd Indian papers do not have even a single author from any IIT. Further, many papers in the remaining 1/3rd category also have co-authors from other orgnisations.
2. IITs carry out world class research: As per this repository of computing literature, the total number of papers from all IITs is lesser than the umber of papers from any single top ranked university like MIT, Stanford, UC Berkeley, CMU, or Cornell.
In June 2011, we interviewed 40+ candidates with MTech (CS). More than 70% of these candidates did their MTech from some IITs (Kharagpur, Roorkee, and Guwahati) and some NITs. Most had reasonably good CGPA’s too. It was shocking to see that most of them could not even write very simple programs that are expected from an average quality 1st sem BTech student at any average institute. Most shocking part was that many of them admitted that during 2 years of MTech at these IITs/NITs, their programming experience was not more than 1-2K lines of code.
This does not mean the students from other institutes did any better. Surely most of them were even more inferior. However, what’s disturbing is that just because somebody has completed MTech, even from IIT, with reasonably good CGPA, does not guarantee an acceptable level of engineering competence of the students. The quality of the research universities has to be judged from the quality of their postgraduate and doctoral programs rather than undergraduate programs only.
I think that we in the academic community should take the criticism with more open mind. Why live with an illusion of being world class without actually attaining the high standards of MIT/Stanford/Berkeley/Harvard/Oxford/CMU etc.?
World class cannot be expected to come in academics, while the elements of ecosystem are not world class. Is faculty’s compensation world class? Is our students’ and parents’ perception about purpose of education world class? Is the curiosity level of our students world class? Is our students’ passion and urge to create something new world class? Is our society’s, adminstrators’, and managers’ risk taking ability world class? Can we dare to administer our exams without invigilators? Can we assume that our students will not indulge in plagiarism in their assignments? Is our funding mechanism world class? Is our industry’s endowments to our institutes world class? Is our industry’s enthusaism for academic research world class? Is our faculty selection process world class? Are our Institute governance systems world class? Is venture capital availability world class? Is our academic regulation and accreditation system world class? Is the role of government agencies in academic regulation and management world class?…
In fact, rather than taking it as a threat, this criticism by the minister should be used as an opportunity by the academic community of India. In a way, it’s good that there is a realization that we don’t have world class institutes. It’s even better that we feel pained at it. Recognition and acceptance of the problem are the first necessary conditions for finding its solution. Hence, the academic community should now come out with blueprints for transforming various elements of the larger eco-system and demand the enabling conditions that are necessary for creating world class institutes. After all, Rome was not built in a day.
Cheers and let’s work harder.
Related articles:
Academic Rigour in Contemporary Indian Higher Education: Some Questions and Reflections

Putcha V. Narasimham
May 27, 2011
Excellent. That is worldclass.
I too was thinking of what Dr Jairam Ramesh said without reacting to agree or disagree with him. Your analysis and suggestion are excellent. All the faculty members of IITs and IIMs must adopt it as their resolution and workout follow up strategies and plans.
Then they have some chance of becoming worldclass…some time (not too soon).
Sanjay Goel, Jaypee Institute of Information Technology
May 27, 2011
Perhaps we should start a nation wide mission of bringing excellence in all our educational institutes. All institutes should make deliberate attempts to enhance their quality as compared to their existing levels. Society should demand and support it. Industry should ‘dare to think beyond IITs and IIMs’ and come forward to help in this mission of countrywide quality enhancement.
Shantanu Kumar
May 27, 2011
Dr Jairam Ramesh is a politician. Are our politicians world class? Forget about others, is Dr Jairam a world class politician?
Varun Mittal
June 1, 2011
If you peanuts you only get monkeys – LKY
Indian professors and Ph.D scholars are one of the worst paid among all their peers.
IIM Banglore /Bengaluru – Ph D student Stipend = 2.88 Lac PA – Taxes < First salary of any IT service sector employee in Infosys/Wipro/ TCS /etc who hire every year in thousands
INSEAD Singapore – PhD student Stipend = 50K SGD = 17 Lac PA – Taxes ( which are much lower than in India) [ even if u PPP, it is much much more]
What at all someone who has enough talent should go to IIM Banglore and not INSEAD.
Dr. Raman
June 1, 2011
I agree with your article and its high time we need to come up with innovative methods to enhance the quality of education and research in India at all levels.
However, we cannot disconnect Politics (certainly not world-class) from our day-to-day life as politicians make majority of the decisions on how to run the country by mass(voter)-friendly choices. For example, increasing the quota in IITs leads to the possibility of compromising on quality and denying the chance to merit.
Imagine, if one of the IITs wants to setup an expensive nano-tech fab, they need to depend on Government funding to large extent and why would selfish politicians spend crores on creating nano-tech fab, rather they would allocate to mass-popular projects.
When I was doing my research, I wanted to attend a conference in US. I could not attend the conference because of lack of funding. I am sure there must be hundreds of researchers like me faced similar situation.
Can you compare the worth and availability of resources in MIT/Stanford/CMU/UCB and IITs? I am sure the all the facilities in all IITs cannot even be compared to the UCB’s nano-tech facility.
Yes, Rome was not built in a day also it was not destroyed in a day. Rome was destroyed by systematic-induction of indiscipline of bureaucracy at all levels over a period of time, not by wars. It is extremely important for us not to fall prey to our own selective-negligence towards harsh realities.
Agam Dua
June 16, 2011
Quantity of publications does not guarantee world class research. Many publications that I have read do not have any research as such, they are more a glorified technical report than a real paper. This is not to say that world class research is not being done. My point is that we should not conclude too much from numbers.